The purpose of the
Impact[1]
Assessment is to provide the analysis of effects pr...
The purpose of the
Impact[1]
Assessment is to provide the analysis of effects produced by European PROGRES
and its predecessor programmes, EU PROGRES[2] and PRO[3],on
sustainable social economic development of 34 local self-governments (LSGs) in
the South East and South West Serbia. The
findings of this Assessment will in turn contribute to improved design of
future development programmes and projects. The Assessment should
include considerations of positive and negative external changes. It will
identify achieved impacts and, where possible, indicate whether longer-term
impacts are likely to occur.
The
Impact Assessment Team, consisted of the Team Leader and a Team Member, will be
responsible to carry out the entire assignment. The Team Leader will be responsible to lead the process and provide
directions and guidelines to the Team Member. More specifically, the Team
Leader will play a leading role in conduct of the following tasks:
- Analyse to what extent the
Programmes have met their overall objectives and purposes
- Identify and assess the key
Programmes’ results
- Identify and assess the
difference that the Programmes made to the beneficiaries
- For interventions that supported
local self-governments (LSGs), such as strategic planning, establishment of
citizens assistance centres, or update of tax-payers’ registries,[4]
analyse the extent to which municipalities enhanced performance, while in
particular considering accountability, transparency, efficiency, participation,
and non-discrimination
- For infrastructure projects,
that included support for development of planning and technical documentation,
construction works, and on the job training, assess effects that these
interventions had on direct beneficiaries, on institutional level, and on wider
socio-economic development. In particular include analysis of extent to which
the Programmes facilitated investments into further development and
implementation of infrastructure projects
- Assess effects of interventions
that were designed to improve the capacities and position of the CSOs and their
relationship with the LSGs
- Assess whether and how the
Programmes contributed to changes in the domain of gender equality and human
rights
- Consider cost-effectiveness
element of the Programmes and, where possible and relevant, identify examples
of cost-effective interventions so that they could possibly be considered for
future actions
- Assess effects of good
governance interventions as a cross-cutting theme[5]
- Analyse contribution of the
Programme to the visibility of the support that the EU and the Government of
Switzerland provide to the development of South East and South West Serbia
- Identify overall lessons learned
as well as those relevant for particular interventions in order to facilitate decision making and programming by
the Government of Serbia, donors and other Programme stakeholders
- Provide realistic, clear, and
practical recommendations that could facilitate programming of future
actions.
Methodology
The Assignment will at least include the following
phases: preparatory activities, field missions, drafting of the report,
finalisation and presentation of the Final Report.
Within preparatory activities, the Impact
Assessment Team will:
- Meet
European PROGRES Team in order to: reconfirm Assignment objectives, scope, and
methodology; to obtain background information needed for the Assessment; and to
reconfirm the extent of logistical and organisational support that will be
provided to the process.
- Meet the European
Integration Office of the Government of Serbia (SEIO) and donor
representatives: the Delegation of the European Union (DEU) and the Swiss
Agency for the Development and Cooperation (SDC) in order to obtain their views
relevant for the Assignment[6]
- Conduct desk research of the
Programme documentation, including the Descriptions of Actions, Reports, and Final Evaluations. European PROGRES
will provide needed documentation, while part of the materials are available on http://www.europeanprogres.org/biblioteka/en/ and www.euprogres.org/biblioteka.php
- Conduct
desk research of relevant national policies, strategies, reports, researches,
and studies, that provide insight into development trends needed for conduct of
the Assignment[7]
- Prepare the Inception
Report that will detail the Impact Assessment Methodology and the work plan.
Only upon the approval of the European PROGRES Programme Manager, the field
work should commence.
The field
work should at least include:
- In-depth interviews
and group discussions with in at least ten beneficiary local self-governments
in the South East and South West Serbia.
- Interviews/group
discussions with representatives of at least ten other development
partners/stakeholders, such as civil society organisations, development
agencies, Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities, or development
projects that will be identified with support from the European PROGRES
- Interviews with at
least ten Programmes’ direct beneficiaries that will be identified by the
Assessors, while the Programme can provide assistance as required
- Interviews with
current or former officials of at least three national institutions that
cooperated with the Programmes,
including the Ministry of Economy, the Coordination Body for Preševo,
Bujanovac, and Medveđa, and Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities
- Interviews/group
discussions with the senior European PROGRES personnel.
The analysis
will include:
- Analysis of the field
work findings. The Impact Assessment Team will prepare the draft Report[8] that will include interim
findings, lessons learned, and recommendations.
- The draft Report will
be discussed with the SEIO, the donors and European PROGRES/UNOPS RSOC. The
Impact Assessment Team will consider feedback provided to the draft and edit
the Report accordingly
The
Final Report, which should be
produced in English and have maximum 40 pages, excluding Annexes, should be presented in a workshop
that will at least include the SEIO, the donors and European PROGRES/UNOPS
RSOC. The Impact Assessment Team will be responsible for efficient functioning
of the process and for completing the Impact Assessment Report in accordance
with the guidelines and format outlined in the Annex I.
European PROGRES will provide logistics and organisational support that
may include: provision of Programme documentation, assistance in development of
field visit programme, identification of Programme stakeholders and
beneficiaries; organisation of meetings, provision of
translation/interpretation, and provision of office space.
[1] The definition of Impact according to of Development
Assistance Committee: the positive and negative changes produced by a
development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. This
involves the main impacts and effects resulting from the activity on the local
social, economic, environmental and other development indicators. The
examination should be concerned with both intended and unintended results and
must also include the positive and negative impact of external factors, such as
changes in terms of trade and financial conditions.
[2] Development Programme, funded by the European Union and
the Government of Switzerland, implemented by United Nations Office for Project
Services (UNOPS) from 2010-2014. The Action supported sustainable development
of 25 local self-governments in the South West and South Serbia. More details
available at http://www.euprogres.org/
[3]The Municipal Development in the South West
Serbia –PRO Programme was EU and Swiss funded area based action that supported
development of six municipalities in the South West Serbia in the first phase,
and eight in the second phase of the intervention.
[4] The detailed insight into interventions that were
designed to support local self-governments will be available in the Programme
documentation.
[5] The Impact Assessment Team will primarily assess EU
PROGRES good governance work while considering principles and models provided
by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), since good
governance actions of European PROGRES are ongoing. The approach for this good
governance intervention included linking of good governance with small and
large infrastructure projects, “pure” governance reforms, and vertical
dimension of good governance.
[6] In case that
the SEIO or either donor proposes changes to the ToR, including different
impact assessment methods, minutes of the meetings must be prepared and approved
in writing by those who have requested the change.
[7] European PROGRES will be able to provide advice
regarding some
[8] The format of
the Report should be in principle the same as the one of the Impact Assessment
Report that is provided in Annex I