Under the
direct supervision of the Livelihoods and Food Security Specialist, and in
accordance with UNOPS policies, procedures and practices, the Consultant shall
conduct the Midterm Review (MTR) of the four projects referred in Annex 1.
The purpose
of the MTR for each of the projects is to:
- Demonstrate
accountability to major stakeholders, including donors and beneficiaries,
- Foster
learning for improving project design and/or implementation, and
- Generate
evidence for policy development.
The MTR should help the project team of the implementing partner identify
key project learnings and adjust the project implementation through a
participatory approach.
The specific objectives of the review of each project include:
1. Address the LIFT-level evaluation questions
concerning the following criteria, in relation to the projects’ overall
approach and their individual components where appropriate:
a. Relevance: The extent to
which the project and its components are suited to: (1) the priorities and
needs of the target beneficiaries; (2) LIFT’s policies and objectives; and (3)
the Myanmar policy and development context.
b. Effectiveness: A measure of
the extent to which the project is attaining its expected results and targets,
based on the project’s theory of change, measurement framework and/or logical
framework.
c. Efficiency: A measure of the
extent to which the project has delivered value for money, in terms of costs
and major benefits.
d. Sustainability: An assessment
of the economic and, where appropriate, social and environmental
sustainability, of a project, considering here the nature of the project
oriented towards policy change.
e. Gender equality: The extent to which
project design and implementation has considered gender-related differences in
the roles, responsibilities and needs of the target beneficiaries and
stakeholders, and enabled greater gender equality and women’s empowerment.
For an
overview of the detailed midterm review questions please refer to Annex 2.
2. Address specific technical questions which
will be detailed in the first days of the consultancy working closely with
LIFT. LIFT will provide detailed task notes for this purpose. Based on these discussions, the consultant(s)
will then develop the appropriate data collection instruments.
3. Distill
lessons and good practices, as well as identify barriers to effective
implementation, in order to provide meaningful and feasible recommendations
for improving the projects in their remaining time, as well as in a possible
extension period.
Approach and Methodology
Although
to be determined by the Consultant, the mid-term reviews will be based on
qualitative methods, mainly key informant interviews and focus group
discussions.
Suggested data sources and collection methods include:
-
Review of existing LIFT and project documentation
(project proposal, the annual and semi-annual reports, research reports and
studies, and FMO’s field visit reports and other relevant project documents),
the LIFT Strategy (2014-2018),
-
Conduct consultations with relevant project
stakeholders and partners, including key stakeholders in the government
In
addition, the Consultant will facilitate a workshop with the respective project
teams to analyse current results, challenges, identify learnings and consider
approaches for improving project design and approaches.
Deliverables
The following documents / events will be required for each project:
1. Design meetings with LIFT FMO and IPs to clarify MTR objectives and
logistics
2. Debriefing meetings with LIFT FMO and IPs to discuss the findings,
lessons, and proposed recommendations (two days after completing the field
trip)
3. Draft Final Report, one for each evaluated project, as per an agreed
table of contents referring to the three purposes of this MTR as addressed in
section III (due up to twenty days after the debriefing presentation, maximum
length 20 pages)
4. Final Report, one for each project (due up to seven days after
receiving final written feedback from LIFT, maximum length 20 pages excluding
annexes).
Work Plan and Estimated Timeframe
Estimated timeframe for all four mid-term evaluation is
52 days, of which about 25 days are estimated for field work in Yangon and
Rakhine State, Myanmar.
Below an overview of the estimated timeframe per
project MTR. Field work is scheduled for October 2017. For more details see
Annex 3.
a)
Tat Lan Programme Phase II -
implemented by IRC:
14.5 working days (of which 8.5 days are in Yangon and Rakhine)
b)
Tat Lan Programme Phase II – implemented by Save the Children: 14.5 working days (of which 8.5 days are in Yangon and
Rakhine)
c)
Tat Lan Programme Phase II – M&E and Learning – implemented by CARE:
8.5 working days
d)
Supporting
the Food Security, Resilience and Social Cohesion of Households and Communities
in Rathedaung Township – implemented
by CARE: 14.5 working days (of which 8.5 days are in Yangon and
Rakhine)
As mentioned in Section II, LIFT also accepts applications for
single project MTRs, but preference is given to applicants who can cover more
than one MTR as the four projects are thematically related.
LIFT will provide facilitators to support the Consultant in the
logistics and arrangements for research and consultations, and for the
interpretation and translation of interviewees’ responses.
LIFT will cover the costs of meeting and workshop venue, support
workshop organization and will provide all logistical and travel arrangements
in-country.