NRM’s interventions are designed to pilot new ways of working and are aime...
NRM’s interventions are designed to pilot new ways of working and are aimed at contributing to systemic change. Both its short-term and long-term interventions incorporate rights objectives and pathways for advocacy and policy dialogue, ensuring that programming is accompanied by substantive efforts to address rights and structural challenges in Myanmar. To ensure its projects are holistically designed, the NRM utilizes a three-pillared approach focused on the integration of H-D-P sectors and the incorporation of a rights-based approach, the transformation of power dynamics and imbalances through greater localization and inclusion, and accountability to both donors and communities through adaptive project design and a robust learning agenda.
In order to assess the effectiveness and impact of its projects, the NRM carries out mid-term and final evaluations of each project. Final evaluations are managed in collaboration with implementing partners and assess the relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency of the project, as well as particular technical issues specific to the project, and include recommendations for improving the evaluated and similar projects going forward.
The NRM is seeking to establish a pool of evaluation experts with knowledge of Myanmar and evaluation experience with projects in humanitarian, development, peace and human rights. The expectation is that these contracted retainers, periodically mobilized, will increase the quality and the value-for-money of the project evaluations, including the contributions of each case to the learning of best practices.
Objectives of the Assignment
Under the direct supervision of the Programme Manager, and in accordance with UNOPS policies, procedures and practices, the consultant shall conduct mid-term and final project evaluations on NRM-funded projects.
Evaluations will assess the overall achievements of the project in its duration, particularly in terms of the project’s relevance, effectiveness and efficiency, as well as review its overall approach and specific methodologies. Each evaluation will be based on a desk review of available documentation as well as interviews with NRM and project staff and should result in a report that summarizes findings, lessons generated, and recommendations.
The list below includes the criteria on which project evaluations should be based.
-
Relevance: The extent to which the project and its components are suited to (1) the priorities and needs of the target beneficiaries; (2) NRM’s policies and objectives; and (3) the current Myanmar policy and development context.
-
Effectiveness: A measure of the extent to which the project attained its expected results and targets, based on the project’s theory of change, measurement framework, and/or logical framework.
-
Efficiency: A measure of the extent to which the project has delivered value for money, in terms of costs and major benefits.
-
Sustainability: An assessment of the sustainability of the project, if relevant. Particular focus on the extent to which the project has identified and established sustainable models or approaches for achieving policy and programme outcomes after NRM support ends.
-
Gender equality and inclusion: The extent to which the project contributed to furthering equity and empowerment for traditionally excluded and marginalised groups - women, people with disabilities, and minorities.
-
Conflict sensitivity: The extent to which the project proved to be effective and responsive to conflict and context dynamics when working in conflict-affected areas and on issues prone to conflict.
-
Nexus: The extent to which the project has been implemented in an integrated manner and tapped into synergies and complementarities across themes, geographies, actors, and other ongoing investments in humanitarian, development, and peace-building interventions.